Technologies for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47385/cadunifoa.v19.n54.5066Keywords:
Legislation, Chemical Absorption, Energy efficiency, Economic feasibility, Gas separationAbstract
In this research, a technological and prospective study of qualitative and descriptive nature was carried out regarding different processes and technologies capable of impacting and promoting the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. This relief process involves the possibility of removing atmospheric pollutants as well as reducing their emissions. It is crucial to emphasize the importance of significant scientific breakthroughs towards the widespread commercialization of these technologies, which are essential for countries to achieve their established goals. This is indispensable for minimizing the predicted disastrous consequences for humanity over the next decades as a result of global warming and environmental changes. Within this scope lies the utilization of CCUS methods (Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage) and the reduction of emissions of N2O, CH4, and fluorinated gases by industries, power plants, the agricultural sector, and the indiscriminate use of land. Simultaneously, there is an urgent need for stricter and more restrictive local, national, and international policies that promote and enforce a gradual, sustainable, yet definitive change in the global energy structure.
Downloads
References
ABGI Brasil. TRL — Saiba mais sobre o Nível de Maturidade Tecnológica 2023. Available at: https://abgi-brasil.com/trl-recursos-financeiros-por-niveis-de-maturidade-tecnologica/. Accessed on: 22nd Nov. 2023.
Abu-Zahra, M. R. M.; Sodiq, A.; Feron, P. H. M. Commercial liquid absorbent-based PCC processes. In: FERON, P. H. M. Absorption-Based Post-Combustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide, 2016. p. 757-778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100514-9.00029-9
American Chemical Society (USA). CAS 2022: Readdressing the balance: Exploring research trends in carbon dioxide sequestration. Available at: https://www.cas.org/sites/default/files/documents/%7B8c884d8f-0522-4792-b474-afee3f5bd378%7D_CASGENENGWHP100657220412-CAS-READDRESSING-BALANCE-WHITE-PAPER_3.0_LETTER_220504.pdf. Accessed on: 30th out. 2023.
Bhatta, L. K. G.; Subramanyam, S.; Chengala, M. D.; Olivera, S.; Venkatesh, K. Progress in hydrotalcite like compounds and metal-based oxides for CO2 capture: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 103, p. 171-196, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.059
BRS Convention and MC Convention (Suiça). Chemicals, wastes and climate change: Interlinkages and potential for coordinated action. Genebra; 2021. Available at: <https://minamataconvention.org/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/Climate_Change_Interlinkages.pdf>. Accessed on: 29th out. 2023.
Budinis, S.; Krevor, S.; Mac Dowell, N.; Brandon, N.; Hawkes, A. An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential. Energy strategy reviews, v. 22, p. 61-81, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003
Bui, M.; Adjiman, C. S.; Bardow, A.; Anthony, E. J.; et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, v. 11, p. 1062-1176, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02342A
Cachola, C. S.; Ciotta, M.; Santos, A. A.; Peyerl, D. Deploying of the carbon capture technologies for CO2 emission mitigation in the industrial sectors. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, V. 7, p. 100102, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2023.100102
Carbon Brief. Carbon Brief clear on climate 2014: Around the world in 22 carbon capture projects. Available at: . Accessed on: 11th Nov. 2023.
Chatterjee, S.; Huang, K. W. Unrealistic energy and materials requirement for direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat. Commun, v. 11, p. 3287, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17203-7
Chauvy, R.; Meunier, N.; Thomas, D.; Weireld, G. D. Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short-to mid-term deployment. Applied energy, v. 236, p. 662-680, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.096
Climate Watch Data. GHG Emissions. Available at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions. Accessed on: 27th of November 2023.
Dziejarski, B.; Krzyżyńska, R.; Andersson, K. Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy: A survey of technical assessment. Fuel, v. 342, p. 127776, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127776
Fennell, P. S.; Davis, S. J.; Mohammed, A. Decarbonizing cement production. Joule, v. 5, p. 1305–1311, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.04.011
Feron, P. H. M. Absorption-based post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide. DUXFORD: Woodhead publishing, 2016.
Gaurina-Međimurec, N.; Mavar, K. N. Geological sequestration of CO2. In: FRAZÃO, L. A. CO2 Sequestration. Zagred, 2019. p. 131-151.
Ghoneim, R.; Mete, G.; Hobley, A. Industrial analytics platform 2022. Steel and Cement Can Drive the Decade of Action on Climate Change: How? Available at: https://iap.unido.org/articles/steel-and-cement-can-drive-decade-action-climate-change-how. Accessed on: 01st of November 2023.
Gibbins, J.; Chalmers, H. Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, v. 36 p. 4317–22, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.058
Gielen, D.; Kram, T. The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in meeting Kyoto targets. Economic Modelling of Climate Change, OECD Workshop Report. 1998. p. 17-18.
Global CCS Institute. Technology readiness and costs of CCS, 2021. Available at: < https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Technology-Readiness-and-Costs-for-CCS-2021/>. Accessed on: 31th October 2023
Grubb, M. C.; Okereke, J.; Arima, V.; Bosetti, Y.; Chen, J.; Edmonds, S.; Gupta, A.; Köberle, S.; Kverndokk, A.; Malik, L. Introduction and Framing. In: SHUKLA, P. R.; et al.Climate Change 2022- Mitigation of Climate Change. New York: New York, 2022. p. 151-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.003
Haugen, N. E. L.; Li, Z.; Gouraud, V.; Bertholin, S.; Li. W, et al. Building the world’s largest Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) unit. Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 129, p. 103975, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103975
Hou, R.; Fong, C.; Freeaman, B. D.; Hill, M. R.; Xie, Z. Current status and advances in membrane technology for carbon capture. Separation and Purification Technology, v. 300, p. 121863, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121863
International Energy Agency (França). IEA 2023: Tracking Clean Energy Progress. Paris, 2023. Available at: <https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-progress-2023/>. Accessed on: 29th October 2023.
International Energy Agency (França). IEA 2024: Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage. Paris, 2023. Available at: . Accessed on: 29th January 2024.
Kamio, E.; Yoshioka, T.; Matsuyama, H. Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Separation Membranes: A Review. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, v. 56, p. 2222000, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219592.2023.2222000
Kamkeng, A. D. N.; Wang, M.; Hu, J.; Du, W.; Qian, F. Transformation technologies for CO2 utilization: Current status, challenges and future prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 409, p. 128138, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128138
Kim, C.; Yoo, C. J.; Oh, H. S.; Min, B. K.; Lee, Ung. Review of carbon dioxide utilization technologies and their potential for industrial application. Journal of CO2 Utilization, v. 65, p. 102239, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102239
Laçin, K.; Buse, Ç.; Binay, B. Anaerobic digestion methods for the production of fuels. In: SHADANGI, K. P. et al. Bioenergy Engineering. Woodhead Publishing, 2023. p. 201-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98363-1.00004-1
Leeson, D.; Mac Dowell, N.; Shah, N.; Petit, C.; Fennell, P. S. A Techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries, as well as other high pu-rity sources. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, v. 61, 71–84, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.020
Lin, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, T.; Zheng, C.; Gao, X. Technical perspective of carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Engineering, v. 14, p. 27-32, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.12.013
Liu, H.; Lu, H.; Hu, H. CO2 capture and mineral storage: State of the art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 189, p. 113908, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113908
Lockwood, Toby. A comparative review of next-generation carbon capture technologies for coal-fired power plant. Energy procedia, v. 114, p. 2658-2670, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1850
Maizland, L. Global climate agreements: Successes and failures. Council on Foreign Relations, v. 23, 2023.
Maj, M.; Miniszewski, M. The Emitting 7: the time and cost of climate neutrality. Warsaw: Polish Economic Institute, 2022.
Manning, C. G. Technology Readiness Levels. NASA 2023. Available at: https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/somd/space-communications-navigation-program/technology-readiness-levels/#:~:text=Technology%20Readiness%20Levels%20(TRL)%20are,based%20on%20the%20projects%20progress. Accessed on: 22 Nov. 2023.
Mikhaylov, A.; Moiseev, N.; Aleshin, K.; Burkhardt, T. Global climate change and greenhouse effect. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, v. 7, p. 2897, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(21)
Ministério do Meio Ambiente (Brasil). CLIMA 2023: Política Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima, 2023. Available at: https://antigo.mma.gov.br/clima/politica-nacional-sobre-mudanca-do-clima.html. Accessed on: 29th October 2023.
Miranda, J. L.; Moura, L. C.; Ferreira, H. B. P.; Abreu, T. P. Antropoceno e o CO2: Processos de Captura e Conversão. Revista Virtual de Química, v. 6, p. 1915-1946, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21577/1984-6835.20180123
Mora, C.; Spirandelli, D.; Franklin, E. C.; Lynham, J.; Kantar, M. B. et al. Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions. Nature climate change, v. 8, p. 1062-1071, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0315-6
Mondal, M. K.; Balsora, H. K.; Varshney, P. Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review. Energy, v. 46, p. 431-441, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.006
Muslemani, H.; Liang, X.; Kaesehage, K.; Wilson, J. Business models for carbon capture, utilization and storage technologies in the steel sector: a qualitative multi-method study. Processes, v. 8, p. 576, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050576
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (USA). Jet Propulsion Laboratory 2023: Global Climate Change: Evidence. Available at: < https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/16/is-it-too-late-to-prevent-climate-change/#:~:text=While%20the%20effects%20of%20human,otherwise%20persist%20for%20essentially%20forever >. Accessed on: 27th Nov. 2023.
National Energy Technology Laboratory (USA). U.S. Department of Energy 2022: Chemical Looping Combustion. Available at: https://netl.doe.gov/node/7478. Accessed on: 12th of October 2023.
Noothout, P.; Wiersma, F.; Hurtado, O.; Macdonald, D.; Kemper, J.; Alphen, K. V. CO2 Pipeline infrastructure–lessons learnt. Energy Procedia, v. 63, p. 2481-2492, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.271
Okoli, C. O.; Lee, A.; Burgard, A. P.; Miller, D. C. A fluidized bed process model of a chemical looping combustion fuel reactor. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, v. 44, p. 259-264, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50038-0
Ozkan, M.; Nayak, S. P.; Ruiz, A. D.; Jiang, W. Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies. Iscience, v. 25, p. 103990, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103990
Pathak, M.; Slade, R.; Shukla, P. R.; Skea, J.; Pichs-Madruga, R.; Ürge-Vorsatz, D.2022: Technical Summary. In: SHUKLA, P. R. et al. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. New York: New York, 2022. p. 51 – 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.002
Pörtner, H. O.; Roberts, D. C.; Poloczanska, E. S.; Mintenbeck, K.; Tignor, M.; Alegría, A.; Craig, M.; Langsdorf, S.; Löschke, S.; Möller, V.; Okem, A. IPCC, 2022: Summary for Policymakers. In: PÖRTNER, H. O. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. New York: New York, 2022. p. 3–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.001
Rackley, S. A. Carbon capture and storage. 2. ed. CHENNAI: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812041-5.00002-7
Rissman, J.; Bataille, C.; Masanet, E.; Aden, N.; et al. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Appl. Energy, v. 266, p. 114848, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848
Senado Federal (Brasil). Senado Notícias 2023: Protocolo de Kyoto. Available at: <https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/entenda-o-assunto/protocolo-de-kyoto/>. Accessed on 31st of October
Subiter (Brasil). Como avaliar a maturidade de uma tecnologia? 2020. Available at: https://www.subiter.com/post/maturidade-tecnologica. Accessed on: 22nd of November 2023.
Sun, X.; Alcade, J.; Bakhtbidar, M.; Elio, J.; et al. Hubs and clusters approach to unlock the development of carbon capture and storage–Case study in Spain. Applied Energy, v. 300, p. 117418, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117418
Terlouw, T.; Treyer, K.; Bauer, C.; Mazzotti, M. Life cycle assessment of direct air carbon capture and storage with low-carbon energy sources. Environ. Sci. Technol., v. 55, p. 11397-11411, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03263
Theo, W.l.; Lim, J. S.; Hashim, H.; Mustaffa, A. A.; Ho, W. S. Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage. Appl Energy, v. 183, p. 1633–63, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.103
Wilberforce, T.; Olabi, A. G.; Sayed, E. T.; Elsaid, K.; Abdelkareem, M. A. Progress in carbon capture technologies. Sci Total Environ, v. 761, p. 143203, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143203
Wu, X.; Wang, M.; Liao, P.; Shen, J.; Li, Y. Solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture for power plants: A critical review and perspective on dynamic modelling, system identification, process control and flexible operation. Appl Energy, v. 257, p. 113941, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113941
Younas, M..; Sohail, M.; Leong, L. K.; Bashir, M. J. K.; Sumathi, S. Feasibility of CO2 adsorption by solid adsorbents: A review on low-temperature systems. Int J Environ Sci Technol, v. 13, p. 1839-1860, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1008-1
Yu, Xiang. CAS 2022: Carbon Capture & Sequestration. Available at: https://www.cas.org/pt-br/resources/cas-insights/sustainability/carbon-capture-sequestration. Accessed on: 29th of October 2023.
Zacari, Lucas (Brasil). Nexo Jornal 2023: O potencial do Brasil para capturar carbono. São Paulo, 2023. Available at: <https://www.nexojornal.com.br/expresso/2023/05/28/O-potencial-do-Brasil-para-capturar-carbono>. Accessed on: 09th of November 2023.
Ziobrowski, Z.; Rotkegel, A. Comparison of CO2 separation efficiency from flue gases based on commonly used methods and materials. Materials, v. 15, p. 460, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020460
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos UniFOA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Declaração de Transferência de Direitos Autorais - Cadernos UniFOA como autor(es) do artigo abaixo intitulado, declaro(amos) que em caso de aceitação do artigo por parte da Revista Cadernos UniFOA, concordo(amos) que os direitos autorais e ele referentes se tornarão propriedade exclusiva desta revista, vedada qualquer produção, total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou meio de divulgação, impressa ou eletrônica, sem que a prévia e necessária autorização seja solicitada e, se obtida, farei(emos) constar o agradecimento à Revista Cadernos UniFOA, e os créditos correspondentes. Declaro(emos) também que este artigo é original na sua forma e conteúdo, não tendo sido publicado em outro periódico, completo ou em parte, e certifico(amos) que não se encontra sob análise em qualquer outro veículo de comunicação científica.
O AUTOR desde já está ciente e de acordo que:
- A obra não poderá ser comercializada e sua contribuição não gerará ônus para a FOA/UniFOA;
- A obra será disponibilizada em formato digital no sítio eletrônico do UniFOA para pesquisas e downloads de forma gratuita;
- Todo o conteúdo é de total responsabilidade dos autores na sua forma e originalidade;
- Todas as imagens utilizadas (fotos, ilustrações, vetores e etc.) devem possuir autorização para uso;
- Que a obra não se encontra sob a análise em qualquer outro veículo de comunicação científica, caso contrário o Autor deverá justificar a submissão à Editora da FOA, que analisará o pedido, podendo ser autorizado ou não.
O AUTOR está ciente e de acordo que tem por obrigação solicitar a autorização expressa dos coautores da obra/artigo, bem como dos professores orientadores antes da submissão do mesmo, se obrigando inclusive a mencioná-los no corpo da obra, sob pena de responder exclusivamente pelos danos causados.
